American Physics in the Cold War

Physicist David Kaiser on the US education funding course, the impact of politics on physics, and connections in rapidly growing community

videos | April 10, 2014

What were the greatest changes in the US science after the World War II? Why did these changes take place? How did it influence scientific journals? These and other questions are answered by Germeshausen Professor of the History of Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology David Kaiser.

Every field in the universities was growing exponentially after the war. There were more people studying history than ever before, more people studying chemistry and art, but the rates of growth weren’t the same. In fact, physics grew twice as quickly as any other field, so even as all the fields were growing rapidly, more and more people were entering universities for higher education, some fields grew much quicker than others and physics led the pack.

Physicist Max Tegmark on the Doppler effect, redshift, nuclear fusion, and what happened 13.8 billion years ago

That was actually a big change in the United States, in the US funding for education had almost never come from the federal level. In fact, a whole century had passed before the last really big effort from the federal government to get students into universities. The previous time had been in the middle of 19th century, right in the early years of the American Civil War when there was a law passed by Congress that guaranteed that every state in the Union would have 1 and eventually 2 universities.

Between around 1950 and 1970 the main American journal for physics research called the Physical Review publishing across all the domains of basic research in physics went from being around 3000 per year to over 30000 pages per year. So it was doubling the annual page count every six years. This sets up all kinds of stresses and people worry about how to keep track of it. No one can read 30000 pages in a year. So one of the things that start happening if you have a speeding up of an otherwise a kind of natural process in the science is specialization.

Germeshausen Professor of the History of Science; Department Head, Program in Science, Technology, and Society, Senior Lecturer, Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Did you like it? Share it with your friends!
    Published items
    To be published soon

    Most viewed

  • 1
    Tim Reynolds
  • 2
    Peter Kivisto
  • 3
    Simon White
  • 4
    Greg Towers
  • 5
    Sophie Scott
  • 6
    Tristram Wyatt
  • 7
    Joanna D. Haigh
  • 8
    David Rubinsztein
  • 9
    Michael Thomas
  • New